|
West |
Arizona |
California |
Colorado |
Idaho |
Montana |
New Mexico |
Nevada |
Oregon |
Utah |
Washington |
Wyoming
California Summary
Below you will find county-by-county maps and tables that illustrate the data in this study.
 |
| Click on chart for a larger version below. |
Our research found that:
- Of the 11 western states, California has the largest area of forested land where homes have already been built next to public lands, and is second only to Oregon in the area of undeveloped, forested private land bordering fire-prone public lands.
- California has over 5,000 square miles of forested private land bordering public land, of which 83 percent has not yet been developed.
- Even though California has the most densely developed wildland urban interface in the West, lot sizes are still larger than those on other private lands.
- Housing in California's wildland urban interface consumes 2.3 acres per person, compared to the 0.5 acres per person average on other private lands in the West.
- California has 341,175 residences in its wildland urban interface, of which 19 percent are seasonal homes or cabins.
- California ranks first among western states in the number of homes built in forested areas next to public wildlands, and ninth in the percentage of those homes that are only seasonally occupied.
Several counties in northern and central California rank high in terms of existing risk of wildfire (number of square miles of the wildland urban interface with homes now). El Dorado County has 20,333 homes spread across 70 square miles of wildland urban interface. In the Southern Cascade range of northern California, Trinity County has 5,331 homes spread throughout 64 square miles of land adjacent to forested public wildlands. Also in the southern Cascades, Siskiyou and Shasta Counties rank quite high in terms of potential future risk (number of square miles of wildland interface that remains undeveloped). Combined, these three neighboring counties in northern California contain 1,253 square miles of private land next to fire-prone wildlands. If homes were to be built in these high-risk places, the cost to defend them against wildfire would be substantial.
Existing Risk Map - Click to Zoom
Yellow areas on the map illustrate existing development in fire-prone areas (forested areas adjacent public lands that have been developed); all other development is shown in red; public lands are shown in green.
California Summary Statistics |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| West-Wide |
3,290.0 |
20,350.1 |
14.0% |
915,071 |
21.0% |
| California |
871.8 |
4,257.0 |
17.0% |
341,175 |
19.0% |
Top 10 Counties in California Ranked by Existing Risk
Counties are ranked by the number of square miles of developed land in the wildland interface |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| El Dorado County |
California |
69.8 |
164.3 |
30.0% |
20,233 |
24.0% |
| Trinity County |
California |
64.1 |
310.9 |
17.0% |
5,331 |
25.0% |
| Nevada County |
California |
46.5 |
132.9 |
26.0% |
17,173 |
21.0% |
| San Bernardino County |
California |
41.2 |
137.9 |
23.0% |
29,643 |
45.0% |
| Tuolumne County |
California |
40.4 |
92.8 |
30.0% |
10,807 |
35.0% |
| Calaveras County |
California |
40.0 |
89.3 |
31.0% |
8,672 |
40.0% |
| Plumas County |
California |
37.8 |
237.1 |
14.0% |
5,788 |
25.0% |
| Placer County |
California |
37.1 |
154.1 |
19.0% |
15,787 |
39.0% |
| Siskiyou County |
California |
34.6 |
528.4 |
6.0% |
3,613 |
16.0% |
| Humboldt County |
California |
33.3 |
210.0 |
14.0% |
7,578 |
12.0% |
Top 10 Counties in California Ranked by Potential Risk
Counties are ranked by the number of square miles of undeveloped land in the wildland interface. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Siskiyou County |
California |
34.6 |
528.4 |
6.0% |
3,613 |
16.0% |
| Shasta County |
California |
32.3 |
413.4 |
7.0% |
6,289 |
10.0% |
| Trinity County |
California |
64.1 |
310.9 |
17.0% |
5,331 |
25.0% |
| Plumas County |
California |
37.8 |
237.1 |
14.0% |
5,788 |
25.0% |
| Lassen County |
California |
3.8 |
222.7 |
2.0% |
699 |
13.0% |
| Mendocino County |
California |
23.7 |
216.7 |
10.0% |
5,171 |
13.0% |
| Humboldt County |
California |
33.3 |
210.0 |
14.0% |
7,578 |
12.0% |
| El Dorado County |
California |
69.8 |
164.3 |
30.0% |
20,233 |
24.0% |
| Tehama County |
California |
3.3 |
157.0 |
2.0% |
547 |
64.0% |
| Placer County |
California |
37.1 |
154.1 |
19.0% |
15,787 |
39.0% |
Click on column headers to see all data in the West sorted by that column.
West |
Arizona |
California |
Colorado |
Idaho |
Montana |
New Mexico |
Nevada |
Oregon |
Utah |
Washington |
Wyoming
Headwaters Economics
Mail: P.O. Box 7059, Bozeman MT 59771
Deliveries: 810 N. Wallace Avenue, Suite B, Bozeman MT 59715
Ray Rasker Ph.D. 406.570.7044 | Ben
Alexander 406.599.7423 | Patty Gude 406.599.7425 | Chris Mehl 406.570.8937
Mark Haggerty 406.570.5626 | Julia Haggerty Ph.D. 406.600.1766 | Jeff
van den Noort 406.599.1653
Banner photo is by Ray Rasker.
© 2007 Headwaters Economics Inc. all rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied or reproduced without prior consent.
|
